Turn Unholy (pp 22-24)

FORUM LOCKED AS OF 4/3/12. Forum for open playtest feedback related to spell tables, mercurial magic, patron magic, corruption and deity disapproval, etc.

Moderators: DJ LaBoss, finarvyn, michaelcurtis, Harley Stroh

Locked
AgeOfFable
Far-Sighted Wanderer
Posts: 25
Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2011 4:49 am
Contact:

Turn Unholy (pp 22-24)

Post by AgeOfFable »

All mundane animals are unholy to Neutral clerics (p24), yet Neutral clerics "may be druids who worship the oneness of nature" (p20) and 'Druid' is a level title (p23).
Teleleli The people, places, gods and monsters of the great city and the islands around.
jmucchiello
Chaos-Summoning Sorcerer
Posts: 779
Joined: Mon Mar 14, 2011 3:28 am

Re: Turn Unholy (pp 22-24)

Post by jmucchiello »

I think the cleric can always forgo "Damage" result in the turning in which case the cleric is merely driving off the animals.
smathis
Cold-Hearted Immortal
Posts: 1095
Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 12:52 pm
Location: Richmond, VA
Contact:

Re: Turn Unholy (pp 22-24)

Post by smathis »

Outside of Lawful clerics, I think "turning" is really off for Clerics. I don't think Neutral clerics get the same bang for their buck by "turning" woodland creatures. Other options I'd consider is allowing Neutral clerics to turn fae creatures. Inverting the results to allow Neutral Clerics to call (as well as turn) woodland creatures.

And possibly allowing Chaotic Clerics to "hold" or "control" undead creatures -- at reduced efficacy of course.

It doesn't seem equal that Lawful Clerics turn undead and demons while Neutral Clerics turn wolves and sparrows and Chaotic Clerics turn unicorns and retainers.

Maybe rolls to summon function at two die types lower? So a d12 or d14?

Maybe rolls to control function at one die type lower? So a d16? And the controlling caster has to spend one "action" maintaining control over the undead? But maybe the controlled can their hit die or under on a d8 to break control? And get a chance to do so each round?
User avatar
finarvyn
Cold-Hearted Immortal
Posts: 2599
Joined: Fri Jun 26, 2009 3:42 am
FLGS: Fair Game, Downers Grove IL
Location: Chicago suburbs
Contact:

Re: Turn Unholy (pp 22-24)

Post by finarvyn »

smathis wrote:It doesn't seem equal that Lawful Clerics turn undead and demons while Neutral Clerics turn wolves and sparrows and Chaotic Clerics turn unicorns and retainers
No, but I think that it's best to have more advantages for the good guys and fewer for the bad guys. It helps players want to be the good guys.

My son currently has this thing about playing assassins, but he's constantly frustrated that the assassins aren't supermen who can slug it out in battle, backstab at will, and so on. (I think he's been reading those Games Workshop books and maybe assassins in their world can do it all.) Anyway, if assassins are too good everyone wants to play them.

The DCC RPG doesn't intend to balance everything, and to me this is a case where it's a good thing.

Just my two coppers.
Marv / Finarvyn
DCC Minister of Propaganda; Deputized 6/8/11 (over 11 years of SPAM bustin'!)
DCC RPG playtester 2011, DCC Lankhmar trivia contest winner 2015; OD&D player since 1975

"The worthy GM never purposely kills players' PCs, He presents opportunities for the rash and unthinking players to do that all on their own."
-- Gary Gygax
"Don't ask me what you need to hit. Just roll the die and I will let you know!"
-- Dave Arneson
"Misinterpreting the rules is a shared memory for many of us"
-- Joseph Goodman
User avatar
Aplus
Hard-Bitten Adventurer
Posts: 141
Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2011 7:06 pm

Re: Turn Unholy (pp 22-24)

Post by Aplus »

The first thing that comes to mind is to have PCs randomly roll alignment in order to prevent them from trying to exploit the differences that are driven by alignment. I like the differences, but I want to take away the opportunity to munchkinize.

1 = Chaotic
2-5 = Neutral
6 = Lawful

Just an idea that I haven't looked closely at yet.
Check out my DCC Resources Page for cool stuff!
Locked

Return to “Playtest Feedback: Spells and Magic”