Goodman Games

Fan Forums
It is currently Thu Dec 14, 2017 11:00 am

All times are UTC - 8 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 20 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue Aug 07, 2012 3:06 pm 
Offline
Mighty-Thewed Reaver
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 04, 2008 4:00 pm
Posts: 304
Location: Virginia
In the game last night, the cleric tried the Detect Evil spell. She rolled decently (a 17). We discovered that this spell let her detect traps for the next hour! This seems pretty powerful to me--am I reading it correctly?


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Tue Aug 07, 2012 4:11 pm 
Offline
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2011 4:05 pm
Posts: 671
Location: Devon, England
Yep, reads that way to me too, though I did notice it says, "inherently dangerous", which could indicate that traps that only capture someone, might not be detected. :twisted:

Colin


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Tue Aug 07, 2012 10:57 pm 
Offline
Chaos-Summoning Sorcerer
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2011 3:34 pm
Posts: 862
Location: Győr, Hungary
Finding a trap is useful, but it still has to be disarmed. ;)

_________________
Vorpal Mace: a humble rpg blog with some DCC-related stuff.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed Aug 08, 2012 9:21 am 
Offline
Mighty-Thewed Reaver
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 04, 2008 4:00 pm
Posts: 304
Location: Virginia
Colin wrote:
Yep, reads that way to me too, though I did notice it says, "inherently dangerous", which could indicate that traps that only capture someone, might not be detected. :twisted:

Ravenheart87 wrote:
Finding a trap is useful, but it still has to be disarmed. ;)

True and true. But I still think that this is an over-extension of "detect evil". I just don't think it should apply to objects (unless they are cursed or evil artifacts/magical items). Would the spell detect a pool of quicksand, or a loaded crossbow? Both are "inherently dangerous in nature"... Perhaps the condition of opposed alignment should be extended to objects. Then it wouldn't detect any neutral objects (such as quicksand or a pit trap), but would detect objects with an opposed alignment.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed Aug 08, 2012 11:48 pm 
Offline
Cold-Blooded Diabolist

Joined: Fri Apr 06, 2012 1:36 am
Posts: 525
Evil not being an alignment means that evil needs to be something in order for a spell to detect it - in DCC that something that defines evil happens to be "meaning to do you harm, or directly opposed to your ideals and beliefs."

It is a bit of a loose definition, in a way, because it means that something is evil to one human and not to another - but at the same time it is a more clear definition of evil than has ever existed in D&D, where an animal that was attempting to eat you, a construct trying to smash you to bits, and a diabolic hall of traps designed to kill in torturous ways were all exempt from any form of moral judgement about their actions regardless of the intent behind them - such as the intent of the person behind their construction and/or placement as devices with which to kill intruders.

As for various questions about what is or is not evil by DCC's definition, the answer usually comes easily just by reading the general description of the spell: creatures of opposite alignment, creatures considered unholy by your deity, and anything with clearly harmful intent, with intent being the key word - so a trap specifically constructed to harm someone is detected, but quicksand which has no more intent to harm you than any other bit of ground you my trip and fall upon is not.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu Aug 09, 2012 9:10 am 
Offline
Mighty-Thewed Reaver
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 04, 2008 4:00 pm
Posts: 304
Location: Virginia
I guess what bothers me the most is the duration of the spell: 6 turns. In the hands of my player, this turned into an "always on" spell (the spell check result of 14 is not that hard to get...). As a result, the cleric was able to automatically find all of the traps and hostile creatures in the dungeon. Not very fun for me (or the player who was running a Thief). I am considering a house rule to shorten it to 6 rounds.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu Aug 09, 2012 9:14 am 
Offline
Cold-Hearted Immortal
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 16, 2012 9:41 am
Posts: 2719
dunbruha wrote:
I guess what bothers me the most is the duration of the spell: 6 turns. In the hands of my player, this turned into an "always on" spell (the spell check result of 14 is not that hard to get...).


This is just the sort of temptation that leads to deity disapproval. If you find that the spell is being overused, you can simply raise the PC's automatic disapproval by qualifying overuse as a sin. Expecting this to be "always on" should try the patience of the most forgiving god. The PC cleric should soon learn to mend his ways without having to change the duration of the spell.

_________________
SoBH pbp:

Cathbad the Meek (herbalist Wizard 1): AC 9; 4 hp; S 7, A 7, St 10, P 17, I 13, L 8; Neutral; Club, herbs, 50' rope, 50 cp; -1 to melee attack rolls. Hideous scar.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu Aug 09, 2012 9:21 am 
Offline
Mighty-Thewed Reaver
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 04, 2008 4:00 pm
Posts: 304
Location: Virginia
Raven_Crowking wrote:
dunbruha wrote:
I guess what bothers me the most is the duration of the spell: 6 turns. In the hands of my player, this turned into an "always on" spell (the spell check result of 14 is not that hard to get...).


This is just the sort of temptation that leads to deity disapproval. If you find that the spell is being overused, you can simply raise the PC's automatic disapproval by qualifying overuse as a sin. Expecting this to be "always on" should try the patience of the most forgiving god. The PC cleric should soon learn to mend his ways without having to change the duration of the spell.

Or the disapproving deity could just reduce the duration of the spell (to, say, 6 rounds... :wink: )


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu Aug 09, 2012 9:23 am 
Offline
Cold-Hearted Immortal
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 16, 2012 9:41 am
Posts: 2719
dunbruha wrote:
Raven_Crowking wrote:
dunbruha wrote:
I guess what bothers me the most is the duration of the spell: 6 turns. In the hands of my player, this turned into an "always on" spell (the spell check result of 14 is not that hard to get...).


This is just the sort of temptation that leads to deity disapproval. If you find that the spell is being overused, you can simply raise the PC's automatic disapproval by qualifying overuse as a sin. Expecting this to be "always on" should try the patience of the most forgiving god. The PC cleric should soon learn to mend his ways without having to change the duration of the spell.

Or the disapproving deity could just reduce the duration of the spell (to, say, 6 rounds... :wink: )


Sure. Gods, being gods, can do what they will. :D

As the book says, "Fear no rule".

RC

_________________
SoBH pbp:

Cathbad the Meek (herbalist Wizard 1): AC 9; 4 hp; S 7, A 7, St 10, P 17, I 13, L 8; Neutral; Club, herbs, 50' rope, 50 cp; -1 to melee attack rolls. Hideous scar.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Mon Nov 19, 2012 3:39 am 
Offline
Deft-Handed Cutpurse
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 27, 2012 4:23 am
Posts: 217
My player's Neutral cleric cast Detect Evil last night. What is the opposing alignment to Neutral? Should I ignore Lawful & Chaotic creatures & just allow the spell to detect threats to the cleric?


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Mon Nov 19, 2012 8:09 am 
Offline
Cold-Hearted Immortal
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 16, 2012 9:41 am
Posts: 2719
Crimsontree wrote:
My player's Neutral cleric cast Detect Evil last night. What is the opposing alignment to Neutral? Should I ignore Lawful & Chaotic creatures & just allow the spell to detect threats to the cleric?


I would consider the nature of the deity worshipped to answer that question.

_________________
SoBH pbp:

Cathbad the Meek (herbalist Wizard 1): AC 9; 4 hp; S 7, A 7, St 10, P 17, I 13, L 8; Neutral; Club, herbs, 50' rope, 50 cp; -1 to melee attack rolls. Hideous scar.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Mon Nov 19, 2012 8:55 am 
Offline
Deft-Handed Cutpurse
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 27, 2012 4:23 am
Posts: 217
Raven_Crowking wrote:
Crimsontree wrote:
My player's Neutral cleric cast Detect Evil last night. What is the opposing alignment to Neutral? Should I ignore Lawful & Chaotic creatures & just allow the spell to detect threats to the cleric?


I would consider the nature of the deity worshipped to answer that question.


The deity is Amun Tor. I couldn't find any answers based on the description of the god found in DCC 35. :?


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Mon Nov 19, 2012 11:27 am 
Offline
Cold-Blooded Diabolist

Joined: Fri Apr 06, 2012 1:36 am
Posts: 525
Crimsontree wrote:
My player's Neutral cleric cast Detect Evil last night. What is the opposing alignment to Neutral? Should I ignore Lawful & Chaotic creatures & just allow the spell to detect threats to the cleric?

Opposing alignment is only one of the things which Detect Evil labels as "evil" and therefore detects, so yes you should ignore alignments in the case of what a neutral character gets out of the spell because there is no opposite to neutral.

So creatures that your deity doesn't like (as mentioned) and anything/anyone seeking to do harm to caster are still detected - and in my not really all that humble opinion, that last one is the most important form of detection.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Mon Nov 19, 2012 3:12 pm 
Offline
Cold-Hearted Immortal
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 16, 2012 9:41 am
Posts: 2719
Crimsontree wrote:
Raven_Crowking wrote:
Crimsontree wrote:
My player's Neutral cleric cast Detect Evil last night. What is the opposing alignment to Neutral? Should I ignore Lawful & Chaotic creatures & just allow the spell to detect threats to the cleric?


I would consider the nature of the deity worshipped to answer that question.


The deity is Amun Tor. I couldn't find any answers based on the description of the god found in DCC 35. :?


Consider this: http://www.obsidianportal.com/campaign/ ... of-riddles

_________________
SoBH pbp:

Cathbad the Meek (herbalist Wizard 1): AC 9; 4 hp; S 7, A 7, St 10, P 17, I 13, L 8; Neutral; Club, herbs, 50' rope, 50 cp; -1 to melee attack rolls. Hideous scar.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Tue Nov 20, 2012 1:15 am 
Offline
Deft-Handed Cutpurse
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 27, 2012 4:23 am
Posts: 217
Raven_Crowking wrote:


Yup. That's roughly the text I have.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Tue Nov 20, 2012 4:22 am 
Offline
Cold-Hearted Immortal
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 16, 2012 9:41 am
Posts: 2719
So, in this case, I would go with TheNobleDrake, and, perhaps, consider anything that gives knowledge "too easily" (i.e., that destroys mystery without the petitioner needing to put in effort) as "evil".

_________________
SoBH pbp:

Cathbad the Meek (herbalist Wizard 1): AC 9; 4 hp; S 7, A 7, St 10, P 17, I 13, L 8; Neutral; Club, herbs, 50' rope, 50 cp; -1 to melee attack rolls. Hideous scar.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu Nov 22, 2012 3:57 am 
Offline
Cold-Hearted Immortal
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 26, 2009 3:42 am
Posts: 2443
Location: Chicago suburbs
FLGS: Fair Game
Historically, Law and Chaos sort of represented "us" and "them" and OD&D was quite vague about how Law=Good and Evil=Chaos, or if this wasn't intended at all. In my campaign I tend to go with a simple alignment system where Good and Law are pretty much the same thing, while Evil and Chaos are pretty much the other thing. While this doesn't mean that DCC has to interpret alignment in this way, it might frame a starting point for discussion. AD&D expanded alignment into the more familar two-axis system where good-evil could be graphed against law-chaos to obtain more options. DCC returns to a more simplistic model, one similar to that of OD&D, and so I tend to look at it from a more global view rather than getting as specific as AD&D.

I would rule that a trap isn't good or evil, any more so than one could argue that gravity is evil since I could fall down and hurt myself. I think that the intent of Detect Evil is to identify the presence of evil creatures and evil artifacts if the artifact is sentient. Thus, I would rule that Elric's blade Stormbringer would be detected but a pit or spike trap would not.

Crimsontree wrote:
My player's Neutral cleric cast Detect Evil last night. What is the opposing alignment to Neutral? Should I ignore Lawful & Chaotic creatures & just allow the spell to detect threats to the cleric?
I rule that the Neutral caster can detect both ways, but has to specify if he is detecting good or detecting evil.

_________________
Marv / Finarvyn
DCC Minister of Propaganda; Deputized 6/8/11
Image
DCC RPG playtester 2011, C&C playtester 2003,T&T since 2003,
ADRP Since 1993, OD&D player since 1975

"The worthy GM never purposely kills players' PCs, He presents opportunities for the rash and unthinking players to do that all on their own."
-- Gary Gygax
"Don't ask me what you need to hit. Just roll the die and I will let you know!"
-- Dave Arneson


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu Nov 22, 2012 4:08 am 
Offline
Cold-Hearted Immortal
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 26, 2009 3:42 am
Posts: 2443
Location: Chicago suburbs
FLGS: Fair Game
Just to be annoying, I thought of an absurd way to extend the original argument of "inherently dangerous in nature"...

How about if a caster faced several foes and cast Detect Evil on them to determine which ones would hit with their attack rolls. Couldn't you argue that those particular foes are more "inherently dangerous in nature" than the rest? That way the party would know which ones to take out first. :lol:

dunbruha wrote:
I still think that this is an over-extension of "detect evil". I just don't think it should apply to objects (unless they are cursed or evil artifacts/magical items). Would the spell detect a pool of quicksand, or a loaded crossbow? Both are "inherently dangerous in nature"... Perhaps the condition of opposed alignment should be extended to objects. Then it wouldn't detect any neutral objects (such as quicksand or a pit trap), but would detect objects with an opposed alignment.
Agreed. And it wouldn't work in my example above, either. Clearly this is an example of reading the words and not the intent of the rule.

_________________
Marv / Finarvyn
DCC Minister of Propaganda; Deputized 6/8/11
Image
DCC RPG playtester 2011, C&C playtester 2003,T&T since 2003,
ADRP Since 1993, OD&D player since 1975

"The worthy GM never purposely kills players' PCs, He presents opportunities for the rash and unthinking players to do that all on their own."
-- Gary Gygax
"Don't ask me what you need to hit. Just roll the die and I will let you know!"
-- Dave Arneson


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Jan 06, 2017 4:44 pm 
Offline
Gongfarmer

Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2016 1:53 pm
Posts: 1
Just a quick question. Does detect evil work through wall's? There is nowhere that says it does or doesn't lime detect magic. Looking at the picture I'm the book it looks to me like they are viewing the presence from around a corner. This is something both me and my DM have been trying to figure it out for a while now.
Thank you for your help in advance.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sun Jan 08, 2017 4:09 pm 
Offline
Cold-Hearted Immortal
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 10, 2006 1:46 pm
Posts: 3199
Location: Left Coast, USA
FLGS: Bizarro World
Realm Devourer B wrote:
...Does detect evil work through walls?....

"This spell does not reveal creatures that are otherwise hidden but does inform the cleric that evil intentions radiate from a certain location."

Based on that, plus the descriptions of the spellcheck results, I do believe it do.

_________________
Gnome Boy • DCC playtester @ DDC 35 Feb '11. • Beta DL 2111, 7AM PT, 8 June 11.
Playing RPGs since '77 • Quasi-occasional member of the Legion of 8th-Level Fighters.

Link: Here Be DCC Monsters

PbP Purple Planeteers!

Havarth • Cleric/Zikcub • Animal trainr • L
S11 A11 S9 P15 I9 L7
AC10, HP12, R0 F1 W2
Glaive+0 1-10
Club+0 1-4
X' chain, sack
Bless, Dtct Ev, Prot fm Evil, Word oCmmnd

Lucius • Cleric/Verlore • Slave • N
S13 A11 S8 P15 I11 L11
AC10+, HP6, R0 F0 W2
Sword+1 _
Club+1 2-5
Hide armor, flint/steel, green stone, oil 1
Crit table +1
Dark, Holy Sanct, Resist Cold/Heat, Word o Cmmnd

Toby • Squire
S13 A10 S14 P15 I16 L9
AC10+, hp3, R0 F1 W1
Lg swrd+1 2-9
Scale armor, sack, helm, L’ rope, torch • Com, Chaos, Hobgob

Kelven • Smuggler
S14 A8 S11 P12 I7 L10
AC9+, hp2(4), In-1, R-1 F0 W0
Sword+1 _
Staff+1 or Sling -1 2-5
Scale armr, waterprf sack, L’ rope, torch, 39cp

Runes:https://i.imgur.com/xGUofHk.jpg
RIP
Stinky Pete, Ostler — Spine snapped by tackling Kith


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 20 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 8 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group