Page 5 of 5

Re: DCC RPG Alternate Cover #2

Posted: Sat Jan 26, 2013 12:26 pm
by Doug Kovacs
Doug, you didn't show them the 4th spine. :)

There was a post of a half done version of the 4th spine on another thread.

Anyone recall where?

Re: DCC RPG Alternate Cover #2

Posted: Sat Jan 26, 2013 1:04 pm
by Rick
Doug Kovacs wrote:
Doug, you didn't show them the 4th spine. :)

There was a post of a half done version of the 4th spine on another thread.

Anyone recall where?
http://www.goodman-games.com/forums/vie ... 896#p91896

Image

Re: DCC RPG Alternate Cover #2

Posted: Sun Jan 27, 2013 9:00 pm
by goodmangames
Only one more alternate cover planned at the moment. Probably just one a year, tops.

At least, that's what I'm saying now. :)

Re: DCC RPG Alternate Cover #2

Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2013 12:35 am
by Ravenheart87
goodmangames wrote:Only one more alternate cover planned at the moment. Probably just one a year, tops.

At least, that's what I'm saying now. :)
How about a d30 edition? When you buy one core book, you roll d30 that determines what kind of cover you get.

Re: DCC RPG Alternate Cover #2

Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2013 10:28 pm
by blindelf
goodmangames wrote:Only one more alternate cover planned at the moment. Probably just one a year, tops.

At least, that's what I'm saying now. :)
I have to admit I don't mind the idea of seeing my shelf
gradually fill with a line of tomes with more of Doug's amazing Appendix N style
character portraits all in a row...I wonder if the Annuals will continue that look.

I think the awesome art on the spines really compliments
the presentation of these books and is one of the many really cool details you guys
have delivered. I could see buying both an Annual and a limited cover core book yearly.

Re: DCC RPG Alternate Cover #2

Posted: Fri Feb 01, 2013 12:44 am
by Skars
Perhaps a cover to match a rather awesome world tour belt buckle? :mrgreen:

Re: DCC RPG Alternate Cover #2

Posted: Fri Feb 01, 2013 7:52 am
by Scott Kellogg
The Wizard edition is impressive in person. The book seems physically easier to read and use as well.