Goodman Games

It seems to me that understanding ADPs is going to be a crucial part of getting up to speed with Eldritch. I know my players will be disappointed if they end up creating a character with weaknesses or vulnerabilities they weren't aware of. So I'm trying to make 110% sure that I understand ADPs and can explain them properly. Apologies if the answers to these questions were staring me right in the face but I missed them.

Deflect ADP

On p33 this is stated as being the MRVs of the base Melee ability, Shield branch and Magic Protect. I spent a bit of time working out where the Shield ability came from. The text of p33 implies that it's a specialisation of Melee, but it wasn't until p62 that I found this stated clearly. But now I am not clear what MRV gets added for "Shield", particularly when the character has one or more Shield masteries. Since the base Melee ability is already included in the Deflect ADP, I am assuming that "Shield" shouldn't add this again, so we aren't talking about the MRV of a full Ability Dice Chain. Am I right in this assumption?

This still leaves a number of possibilities:

• a) just the MRV of the Shield specialisation,
• b) the MRV of Shield > {mastery of the shield being used}
• c) the MRV of Shield > {highest ranked mastery}
• d) the MRV of Shield and all masteries

Let's consider a character with two shield masteries, and no Magic ability, who happens to be using a small shield:



Using the above possibilities, her Deflect ADP could be:

• a) 14 = Melee 8 + Shield 6,
• b) 18 = Melee 8 + Shield 6 + Small Shield 4,
• c) 20 = Melee 8 + Shield 6 + Medium Shield 6,
• d) 24 = Melee 8 + Shield 6 + Small Shield 4 + Medium Shield 6.

There is quite a difference there, so I would like to know which one is correct. Also, if the character loses her shield during combat, would the Deflect ADP change?

Similarly, I'm not sure how "Magic Protect" should be calculated. Is it just the MRV of the base Magic ability, or would specialisations and masteries come into play here?

Evade ADP

I started off assuming that this used the MRV of the base Agility and Reflexes abilities (which would be consistent with the other ADP calculations). However, the discussion of the Agility ability on p19 and the Reflexes ability on p21 says the Evade ADP should use the trees.

Does this mean:

• a) the MRV of the base ability plus the highest ranked specialisation and mastery, or
• b) the MRV of the base ability and all specialisations and masteries?

Let's consider a character who has no Pugilism, but a number of Agility and Reflexes specialisation and masteries:



Using the above possibilities, her Deflect ADP could be:

• a) 32 = Agility 10 + Acrobatics 6 + Evasion 4 + Reflexes 6 + Catching 6
• b) 48 = Agility 10 + Acrobatics D6 + Evasion D4 + Balance 8 + Combat 4 + Reflexes 6 + Catching 6 + Dodging 4

Weaponry ADP

Actually I think I've got this one. However, on p13 & p23 it says "[includes Parry, Entangle, and Keep At Bay]". The discussion on p33 makes it clear that the Weaponry ADP is an abstraction of things like parrying with a sword, entanglement with a flail and keeping foes at bay with a spear. However, the fact they are capitalised made me wonder whether these were actually specialisations of Melee at some point during the rules development? If so, I'd be interested to know why you removed them, and what the effect of adding a Melee > Parry specialisation would be.

The Deflect DP is MRV of basic Melee, plus the MRV of the Shield specialization, plus the MRV of any Shield masteries. Then, you modify the Deflect DP based on the type of shield used.

A small shield offers zero damage reduction, but grants a + 50% to Deflect DP.
A medium shield grants a +1 to the armor check, and Deflect is calculated normally.
A large shield grants a +2 to armor check, but incurs a penalty of - 50% to Deflect DP.



Option b is correct. The MRV of the base ability and all specialisations and masteries?



In an early draft of the rules "weaponry" was called "parry". This was very limiting, in a narrative sense. If you used a pole-arm for instance, the length of the pole-arm could keep your opponent at bay, thus mitigating potential-harm. Or you could avoid harm by entangling the opponent's weapon (extra rules can cover *keeping* your opponents weapon entangled)...anyway, these are not specializations because all die-ranks in the tree add to the Weaponry DP anyway. However, if you DID specialize in something like that, you could work with the GM allowing for special moves during combat, using opposed rolls (ADC vs. opponent's ADC or primary threat rank.

A couple of related questions here:

- if you've take some deflect hits, and then change shield for some reason, what happens to the ADP? e.g I have Deflect of 20, and I'm using a Heavy Shield, so I get +2 armour, but Deflect at 50% = 10. I use up these 10 and then swap to a light shield. Do I now get no benefit, or (20-10)X2 (light shield) = 20 Deflect, or some other number?

- similarly, if I have Mastery in a weapon, I get the mastery value of that specific weapon added to my weaponry pool. If I use all my weaponry pool, then change weapons, what happens? e.g. I start out with a weapon with +20 mastery, and a weaponry ADP of 15, so my total weaponry pool is 35. I use up my weaponry pool to zero, am disarmed, and then pull out a smaller weapon as backup. In this case it seems like my weaponry pool would still be zero, as I've gone from +20 to (say) +10 and still have used up all the points. What about if I was using a +10 weapon, was knocked to zero, dropped it, then picked up a +20 weapon? Do I get 0+20 points, or 0+10(difference) points?

thanks,

Mark

I believe the answer to this question is on Pg 33 (lower left side of page):
"The full point total of Weaponry ADP is usuable by the creature regardless of the weapon wielded. A creature may switch between weapons at will..."

This is true, but it does also say (sorry, no book with me at the moment, so no reference), that the mastery points gained when a weapon is used are lost if the weapon is changed/dropped etc, to prevent people starting out with a +20 weapon at the start of combat and then switching to a different weapon straightaway. This implies that you do need to track those points somehow, and since the pool can't drop below zero, you may need to know what happens if so!

cheers,

Mark

I have no idea what the official answer might be, but as a GM I'd be tempted to allow a character to pick up a different weapon and add its Mastery bonus to his Weaponry ADP as long as his Weaponry pool had already reached 0. (So in effect his new Weaponry ADP would be equal to the Mastery bonus of whatever weapon he picked up).

From a logical standpoint, this could represent the fact that attackers need to adjust their attack strategies depending on what weapon the defender is using, because different weapons are used differently. Picking up a new weapon gives the defender a bit of a breather while his opponents adjust to the new tactics.

And I see it leading to a cool swashbuckling cinematic scene where the hero has depleted his ADPs, but the bad guys keep on coming. The hero flees through a door, and finds himself in a long hallway with various weapons adorning the walls. The bad guys pour through the door. As the hero retreats down the hallway, he drops his axe and grabs a sword of the wall. Parry, parry! Still retreating, he drops the sword and grabs a spear. Parry, parry! Still retreating, he drops the spear and grabs a dagger...now he's screwed.

You get extra defensive points at the beginning of combat if you start out with a mastered weapon. I'd record those points seperately, just to make it easier. If you lose or drop that weapon, those points vanish. Some weapons have a big bonus to the Weaponry DP, so I thought it might be unbalancing to the game to allow switching weapons with full bonus during a single combat. If that were allowed, I might lower the defensive bonuses first...

Maybe the following could be made an optional rule. I think as written it would be too powerful to allow full mastery bonus for switching mastered weapons during a single combat. I'd bet a lot more characters would stick to katanas and fencing swords if it were allowed (encouraging a kind of meta-gaming that the system tries to discourage).

Right now, there are five levels of mastery bonus ... 0, 5, 10, 15, and 20 temp points of the Weaponry DP at the start of combat, assuming you being with the mastered weapon. A "switching" rule might make it something more like...

level 1 mastery bonus (none, such as with a dagger)
level 2 master bonus (+4 temp hit points to Weaponry DP)
level 3 master bonus (+6 temp hit points to Weaponry DP)
level 4 master bonus (+8 temp hit points to Weaponry DP)
level 5 master bonus (+10 temp hit points to weaponry DP).

These temporary mastery based hit points would be recorded seperately. I'd allow that bonus only once per combat per mastered weapon type. So if a master of the long sword (a level 5 master bonus weapon) had a +10, but took two hits for 5 threat points, and then switched to his long chain, he'd gain +8. However, he could not switch back to his long sword and get that +10 again.

This would be a "revolving" defense pool, in a sense. A workable mechanic...let me know if you like it better than the current rules!

Well, you've played the game and I haven't so your judgment as to what is unbalancing is probably better than mine. I don't know that it's all that unbalancing, though, if you require a character to be at 0 ADP before giving a bonus for switching weapons. If a character has already depleted all his ADPs and there are still enemies coming, I don't imagine another 10-20 points will make that much difference. Most characters probably aren't going to have masteries in more than a couple kinds of weapons anyway, are they? Or are they? Like I said, I haven't actually played the game yet.

Another way to do it might be to limit it by weapon type rather than defense bonus...you only get the mastery bonus from one sword weapon, one axe weapon, one bludgeon weapon, etc per combat.

But yeah, in any case switching back to a weapon you've already used you clearly would not get the bonus for it again.

True, most characters probably won't be mastered in more than a few weapons. I'd be a little cocerned about min/maxing if switching weapons allowed for the mastery bonus with each new weapon in a single combat, but I don't know if it would "break" anything either.



I'd like to see a book of expanded rules and stuff for the game one day, but that's a long range project. As a player, I like optional rules.