Mech costs help
Moderators: DJ LaBoss, finarvyn, Harley Stroh, walrusjester, mythfish
Mech costs help
Well I just picked up my copy of this game and its seems very cool. I just had a few questions about some things that seem to have been left out of the book.
On page 81 of the dragon mech main book, linked weapons are bought up as something that can be added on. However, it does not list any cost for these, in coins, or PUs. I know that it can't possible be free. What are those numbers?
Also there are many examples given of a mech stored in another mech takes up PUs double the size of the one being stored. However, it always says that a size huge mech would take up 8 PUs, this should be 10 right?
These are my only questions for now I guess! Really need to know the cost of linked weapons!
On page 81 of the dragon mech main book, linked weapons are bought up as something that can be added on. However, it does not list any cost for these, in coins, or PUs. I know that it can't possible be free. What are those numbers?
Also there are many examples given of a mech stored in another mech takes up PUs double the size of the one being stored. However, it always says that a size huge mech would take up 8 PUs, this should be 10 right?
These are my only questions for now I guess! Really need to know the cost of linked weapons!
-
- Chaos-Summoning Sorcerer
- Posts: 790
- Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2004 1:47 pm
- Location: Louisville, KY
- Contact:
I think I'd let my players link weapons for free assuming someone in the group made a mechcraft roll and maybe had mech weapon proficiency with the particular weapons.
Although with linked weapons you do get the advantage of being able to fire both weapons with a single crewperson, the drawbacks are that both weapons must be aimed at the same target and both weapons must be fired. If you're in a situation where you only have one target you want to destroy, it's not much of a drawback. If you find yourself in a place with multiple targets and multiple gunners, you can still only fire at one target. Also, if you you're in a situation where you simply want to disable your target, having to fire two steam cannons at it may make that goal more difficult.
Whether or not the drawbacks are equal to the advantage would probably depend a lot on your GM. If my players linked weapons, I'd make sure those situations came up once in a while.
Although with linked weapons you do get the advantage of being able to fire both weapons with a single crewperson, the drawbacks are that both weapons must be aimed at the same target and both weapons must be fired. If you're in a situation where you only have one target you want to destroy, it's not much of a drawback. If you find yourself in a place with multiple targets and multiple gunners, you can still only fire at one target. Also, if you you're in a situation where you simply want to disable your target, having to fire two steam cannons at it may make that goal more difficult.
Whether or not the drawbacks are equal to the advantage would probably depend a lot on your GM. If my players linked weapons, I'd make sure those situations came up once in a while.
-
- Wild-Eyed Zealot
- Posts: 100
- Joined: Fri Jan 21, 2005 9:36 am
- Location: Oklahoma
- Contact:
Well having two weapons fire at one thing could be bad, but on the other hand you could make some very killer combinations. Like hooking up two Gargantuan Javelin Racks, thats 10 attacks with only one attack. Granted reloading could take longer, but you'd be a freaking machine gun everytime the mech fired. Or a double bore puncher, that only takes on crew most of the time. A drawback of only being able to fire both weapons at one target doesn't seem that bad. Heh heh maybe I'm thinking with my mekton zeta mind! I'm mostly just wondering if the cost was left out at all.
-
- Wild-Eyed Zealot
- Posts: 100
- Joined: Fri Jan 21, 2005 9:36 am
- Location: Oklahoma
- Contact:
-
- Cold-Hearted Immortal
- Posts: 2703
- Joined: Sun Dec 01, 2002 12:41 pm
- Location: San Jose, CA
Re: Mech costs help
I can't believe I overlooked this for so long! You've discovered a prolific error. I originally had Large, Huge, and Gargantuan mechs at 2 PU, 4 U, and 8 PU respectively, lining up with the normal d20 sizing conventions (size Medium = 1 and everything doubling thereafter). You'll see that starting with size Colossal they line up with that continued doubling... 16 x2 = 32 x2 = 64 etc.guesty the guest wrote:Also there are many examples given of a mech stored in another mech takes up PUs double the size of the one being stored. However, it always says that a size huge mech would take up 8 PUs, this should be 10 right?
But you can't really make any cool mechs with only 2 PU or 4 PU, especially once you factor in crew space. Even Gargantuan mechs at 8 PU are pretty lame. So I went back and increased the PU on the Large, Huge, and Gargantuan mechs to allow for cooler options at the smaller sizes.
I updated this in Table 2-2. Apparently I didn't update it in several other places -- including the explanation of Payload Units on the same page. And nobody else involved in the book noticed it either!
So here's the official errata. Mechs of size Large, Huge, and Gargantuan have payload usage equal to that on table 2-2 on page 72 of DragonMech. But for purposes of the physical space they occupy, treat their "doubled" amount as lining up with the "normal" amounts of 4, 8, and 16 PU. The explanation is that smaller mechs need less superstructure to support their own weight, so there's proportionately more space on the interior. And, of course, this conveniently maintains internal consistency in the game world. (Otherwise, things like Nedderpik's space usage in table 7-2 wouldn't be right!)
Does that help?
As other people have pointed out in this thread, there are benefits and drawbacks to linked weapons. In my games they never got out of hand so I didn't need to give them a cost. But your question is valid... it can definitely be powerful, and if you're playing with power-gamers I can see how linked weapons could be exploited. You don't want one trigger to fire 50 guns! The ability to fire two weapons at no targeting penalty is roughly equivalent to two feats (Mechwalker + Mechidextrous), though perhaps a little less powerful since you can't necessarily move the mech at the same time, and they have to fire at the same target. If you want to assign a cost, gold pieces probably wouldn't be the way to go, because any power gamer worth his salt can rack them up fast. I'd recommend either a low-powered feat (Linked Weapon Usage: you can fire up to 2 linked weapons at no penalty; each time you take the feat, you can link up another weapon), or some skill synergy (with 5 ranks in Mech Pilot you can fire 2 linked weapons plus another linked weapon for every 5 ranks of Mech Pilot thereafter)... or something along those lines.guesty the guest wrote:On page 81 of the dragon mech main book, linked weapons are bought up as something that can be added on. However, it does not list any cost for these, in coins, or PUs. I know that it can't possible be free. What are those numbers?
Hope that helps.
-
- Chaos-Summoning Sorcerer
- Posts: 790
- Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2004 1:47 pm
- Location: Louisville, KY
- Contact:
Re: Mech costs help
Another thing to keep in mind when trying to do stuff like this is that whatever a PC can do, an NPC can do too (and probably better). That knowledge alone has kept many players from getting too out of hand.goodmangames wrote: You don't want one trigger to fire 50 guns!
Thank you Mr.goodman! Heh heh, I see which you mean about the trade offs of linked wepaons. I just wanted to double check it. And no problem on the size thing, heh heh, it doesn't take away from this awesome book in the slightest!
And darn right NPCs can do it better, heh heh. I'll have to keep that in mind... *evil laugh* I should really sign up and register for this forum...
And darn right NPCs can do it better, heh heh. I'll have to keep that in mind... *evil laugh* I should really sign up and register for this forum...
NPC crafters can always do better for the sole reason that NPCs can afford to concentrate on non-combat abilities at the expense of combat viability... (maybe if the PCs could hire death guards... )
and other NPC enemies can have the finds to buy that better equipment becasue, well, they have legitimate in-game money earning abilities
and other NPC enemies can have the finds to buy that better equipment becasue, well, they have legitimate in-game money earning abilities
-
- Wild-Eyed Zealot
- Posts: 100
- Joined: Fri Jan 21, 2005 9:36 am
- Location: Oklahoma
- Contact:
haha, not happening
no NPC is going to have (in my world) abilities above and beyond what a character of the same level could be capable of
it will take them just as long to create a mech or do a piece of work as a PC would, and rolls will have to be made and time taken to complete any work
which is not to say an NPC will not be taking 10 or 20 wherever possible
no NPC is going to have (in my world) abilities above and beyond what a character of the same level could be capable of
it will take them just as long to create a mech or do a piece of work as a PC would, and rolls will have to be made and time taken to complete any work
which is not to say an NPC will not be taking 10 or 20 wherever possible